Invasive vs. noninvasive neurotechnology

Illustration of DBS system
Illustration of a DBS system for Parkinson's disease and the neural circuit for voluntary motion control (right). Figures in Cagnan et al., 2019.

Invasive vs. noninvasive neurotechnology

Neurotechnologies can be categorised as either invasive or non-invasive. Invasive neurotechnology involves a procedure that penetrates a physical boundary of the user, such as the skin. For example, deep brain stimulation uses electrodes that are implanted to target brain regions, such as the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease (Cagnan et al. 2019). The stimulation pulse generator is also placed inside the patient’s body. In contrast, non-invasive systems remain outside the physical boundary. For example, EEG game controllers use electrodes on the scalp. Their signal processing and utilization modules are also outside the physical boundary.

 

In general, neural signals from noninvasive systems are less specific than those from invasive systems. However, this does not necessarily mean that noninvasive systems are inferior to invasive systems. There are several applications where noninvasive signals have been used effectively (See an example here).

 

Reference: Cagnan, H., Denison, T., McIntyre, C. et al. (2019). Emerging technologies for improved deep brain stimulation. Nat Biotechnol 37, 1024–1033.

© 2024 GoodNeuro
    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Let neuro­technology work for you

    Not the other way around
    © 2024 GoodNeuro - All rights reserved.
    Built by Webmatic

    Subscribe for news and important information

    Newsletter